Install on your iOS device:
Tap then "Add to Home Screen"
  • SUPPORTING RESPONSIBLE SHOOTING

Essential Knowledge

Shotguns aren’t the problem

Shotguns aren’t the problem 2560 1707 Chris Downs

Summary

The Home Office may soon collapse two distinct licensing regimes into one. This move risks undermining public safety, destabilizing lawful ownership, and ignoring the true lessons of Keyham.

Introduction

On 29 June 2023, the Home Office launched a public consultation on proposed changes to UK firearms licensing. These proposals stem from high-profile reviews, including:

  • The Prevention of Future Deaths report following the tragic shooting in Keyham, 2021
  • The Independent Office for Police Conduct’s assessment of Devon and Cornwall Police’s handling of the case
  • The Scottish Affairs Committee’s inquiry into regional firearm regulations
  • The Coroner’s Warning—and Government Response

In his report, Senior Coroner Sir Ian Arrow expressed concern over the statutory presumption that certificates “shall be granted” unless specific criteria are not met. He recommended reversing this—requiring applicants to first prove their suitability.

The Home Office replied:

We have carefully considered your point… but do not agree… Sections 27 and 28 are drafted to support consistency in police decision-making and give certainty to the applicant… This supports public safety…

This exchange reveals a tension between professional opinions that we now see changed under the current UK Government.

Why Do We Have Two Regimes?

Shotguns were historically treated as culturally distinct from pistols and rifles, due to their use in agriculture and sport. As such, they were not originally subject to the same controls.

In fact, the law specifically states that shotgun possession should not be restricted to those who intend to use them or lend them to others to use (See Sec 28(1B) Firearms Act 1968). This enables possession of heirlooms, antiques and for other diverse reasons.

The History

  • Firearms Act 1920: Targeted pistols and rifles feared to be misused by revolutionaries. Shotguns, which were commonplace, were excluded.
  • Firearms Act 1937: Mentioned shotguns for the first time, defining them as having barrels at least 20 inches long (now 24″).
  • Firearms Act 1968: Consolidation: In response to rising crime involving “sawn-off” shotguns, this Act introduced Section 2 shotgun certificates with less stringent requirements than Section 1 firearms.

This historical position reflects not just convenience, but public consensus—recognising practical and cultural differences.

The likely affects of alignment

The proposal to require shotgun holders to justify each firearm (as under Section 1) would:

  • Overwhelm disposal channels: If holders relinquish shotguns en masse, lawful disposal pathways (RFDs & Police) may fail—raising risks of diversion.
  • Put shooting at risk: Thousands may surrender certificates, not due to risk but because of increased red tape.
  • Strain police capacity: Additional scrutiny means more checks, longer processing times, and resource reallocation.
  • Fail to address root causes: Keyham and similar tragedies involve failures of assessment and enforcement—not regime design.

Importantly, none of the past incidents cited would likely have been prevented by the proposed alignment. Legislation should be evidence-led, proportionate, and practical.

Conclusion:

Public Safety Must Lead—Not Political Optics

Shotgun and firearm regimes are different for good reason. Reform should enhance actual safety, not just the appearance of control. That means assessing holder suitability, ensuring enforcement consistency, and supporting lawful ownership—not destabilizing it.

The Home Office is expected to launch a second consultation later in 2025. Every stakeholder—shooting organisations, legal experts, certificate holders, and the public—must engage.

This isn’t administrative tidying. It’s a fork in the road for UK shooting culture. Reform must serve real safety—not just the illusion of control.

Pardon

Pardon 2560 1708 Chris Downs

Summary

Audiologist Carl Weldon explores the overlooked danger of hearing loss within shooting environments.

Drawing on over a decade of clinical experience, Carl breaks down how sudden impulse noise like gunfire can cause permanent sensorineural hearing damage. He explains the science behind it, outlines practical strategies for prevention—including electronic protection and double-layered ear defence—and provides clear pathways for those already affected by hearing issues.

Whether you’re a certificate holder, instructor, or simply part of the shooting community, this guest article is a must-read for understanding, preventing, and managing hearing loss.

Protect what you can’t replace. Every shot. Every time

Member Benefits

Protect your hearing and your wallet – Mansfield Wax & Hearing Clinic will offer 10% discount on all premium level hearing aids to all members of firearmslicensing.net.

Mention your membership when first making contact and show your digital / physical card on attendance.

They can be found at https://www.themansfieldwaxclinic.co.uk/

About Carl Weldon

Carl has been a BSc qualified Audiologist for over a decade. After first qualifying he worked within the NHS before moving to the private sector to be able to offer a wider range of services and technology. He set up The Mansfield Wax & Hearing Clinic in 2021 to address gaps in available Audiology services.

Hearing Loss and the Importance of Protection in the Shooting Environment

When we talk about firearms safety, most people immediately think of eye protection, safe handling, and secure storage. However, one often overlooked aspect of firearms safety is hearing protection.

Exposure to gunfire, even during controlled and lawful shooting activities, can cause permanent hearing damage; sometimes after just a single shot.

Understanding Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common type of permanent hearing loss. It is caused by damage to the delicate hair cells in the inner ear (cochlea) or to the auditory nerve pathways that transmit sound signals to the brain. Unlike conductive hearing loss, which can often be medically or surgically treated, sensorineural hearing loss is typically irreversible.

Loud noise, particularly sudden and intense sounds like gunfire, is one of the primary causes of SNHL. The inner ear contains thousands of tiny hair cells that respond to sound vibrations. When these cells are damaged, especially by high-decibel noise, they do not regenerate.

As a result, affected individuals may experience:

  • Difficulty understanding speech, particularly in noisy environments
  • Tinnitus (a persistent ringing or buzzing in the ears)
  • Permanent reduction in hearing sensitivity

How Gunfire Affects Hearing

Gunfire is an impulse noise, meaning it is extremely loud and occurs suddenly. The average gunshot can measure between 140 and 175 decibels, well above the threshold for immediate hearing damage (about 120 decibels). To put this in perspective:

  • 85 dB: the level at which prolonged exposure can cause damage (e.g. lawnmower)
  • 120 dB: the pain threshold
  • 140+ dB: immediate danger zone (typical for gunfire)

Even a single unprotected shot can cause instantaneous and permanent hearing loss, especially in confined spaces or indoor ranges where sound reverberates.

Risk Is Not Just for Shooters

It’s not only shooters who are at risk. Range officers, instructors, gun bearers and spectators are also.

Anyone in proximity to gunfire can suffer hearing damage if proper precautions are not taken. Cumulative exposure over time without protection drastically increases the risk.

How to Minimise the Risk of Hearing Loss

Fortunately, hearing loss from gunfire is entirely preventable. Here’s how you can protect yourself and others in the shooting environment:

Always Wear Hearing Protection

Use high-quality ear protection every time you are around gunfire, whether shooting or observing.

  • Earplugs: Foam earplugs offer good protection and are inexpensive, but they must be properly inserted.
  • Earmuffs: Over-the-ear muffs provide a higher noise reduction rating (NRR) and are often more consistent in their protection.
  • Double Protection: For maximum protection, especially with high-calibre firearms or indoor shooting, use both plugs and muffs simultaneously.

Use Electronic Hearing Protection

Modern electronic earmuffs protect against loud sounds while allowing you to hear speech and ambient noise. They are especially useful for communication on ranges or during instruction.

Limit Exposure

Reduce the amount of time spent in high-noise environments and take regular breaks away from the firing line to give your ears a rest.

Maintain Distance

When not actively shooting, stay behind safety barriers or further from the source of the gunfire. Distance reduces decibel exposure significantly.

Educate and Equip Others

If you’re an instructor, range officer, or experienced shooter, educate newcomers about the dangers of noise-induced hearing loss and ensure that hearing protection is both readily available and properly used.

Support for Those Already Affected by Hearing Loss

While prevention is crucial, many individuals in the shooting community have already experienced some level of hearing loss. If you are among them, know that support is available, and taking action can significantly improve your quality of life.

Hearing Assessments and Diagnosis

The first step is a professional hearing assessment. Audiologists can determine the type and extent of hearing loss and offer guidance on management options. Early intervention can also help prevent further deterioration.

Hearing Aids and Assistive Devices

Modern hearing aids are highly effective, discreet, and adaptable to different environments—including ranges and outdoor activities. There are also assistive listening devices and apps that enhance communication in noisy settings.

Tinnitus Management

For those experiencing tinnitus (ringing in the ears), various treatment strategies exist:

  • Sound therapy or masking devices
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
  • Mindfulness and relaxation techniques

These can help reduce the distress caused by chronic tinnitus.

Support Groups and Resources

Connecting with others facing similar challenges can be reassuring and informative. Look for:

  • Local or online hearing loss support groups
  • Veteran services (if applicable)
  • National charities or hearing health organizations that offer education and advocacy

Ongoing Education

Stay informed about hearing conservation, technological advances, and coping strategies. Even with existing hearing loss, protecting your remaining hearing remains essential.

Final Thoughts

Hearing is one of our most vital senses, yet it is all too easy to take it for granted—until it’s too late. In the shooting community, awareness of noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss must become just as routine as wearing safety glasses or checking that a firearm is unloaded. By adopting a proactive approach to hearing protection, shooters can continue to enjoy their sport or profession without sacrificing their long-term auditory health.

Stay safe. Shoot responsibly. Protect your hearing.

🩺 The Mansfield Wax & Hearing Clinic – Hearing Health Specialists

Located in Mansfield, this clinic provides expert audiology care with a focus on restoring and protecting hearing. Their services include:

Ear Wax Removal
Safe, painless microsuction performed by qualified audiologists. Ideal for shooters experiencing muffled hearing or discomfort due to wax buildup.
Hearing Assessments
Comprehensive evaluations to detect hearing loss early—especially valuable for those exposed to impulse noise like gunfire.
Hearing Aids
A wide selection from leading brands (Phonak, Starkey, Oticon), tailored to individual needs and lifestyles.
Personalised Care & Ongoing Support
Patients benefit from continuity with the same audiologist, advanced diagnostic tools, and a welcoming environment.

Young People and Firearms

Young People and Firearms 2560 1703 Vicky Downs

We clarify the legal landscape surrounding young people and firearms in the UK—covering certificate eligibility, age-related restrictions, supervision, and practical pathways into shooting sports.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Final Chapter for Lead

Final Chapter for Lead 1024 1024 Vicky Downs

The UK is phasing out lead ammunition by 2029. With a 3-year transition ahead, shooters must adapt to new rules.

Here’s what this shift means for the future of UK shooting.

Introduction:

On 10th July 2025 the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) announced a ban on “Toxic lead ammunition”.

Environment Minister Emma Hardy said:

“Britain is a proud nation of nature lovers, but our rivers are heavily polluted, and majestic birds are declining at an alarming rate.

 

This new ban on lead in ammunition for most uses will help reverse this – rejuvenating pride in our countryside by protecting precious birdlife and cleaning up rivers.

 

Non-lead alternatives are readily available, and we’ll continue to work closely with the shooting sector throughout this transition.”

🧑‍⚕️ This policy is driven by strong evidence of health risks, especially for children and wildlife.

🔄 A major transition away from lead is coming— use the 3-year transition period to plan ahead for alternative ammunition.

🧭 Enforcement is likely at retail level, so supply chains will feel the change first.

The Message – in Brief:

The UK Government plans to introduce legislation restricting sale and use of lead ammunition by summer 2026, followed by a three-year transition period ending in 2029.

It rejected earlier proposals for a five-year transition saying that this extended time period had taken impact to supply chains from Covid-19 into consideration.

  • 🗓️ Legislation introduced: Summer 2026
  • ⏳ Transition period: 2026–2029
  • 🚫 Full ban effective: 2029 – covering sale and use of lead shot and large-calibre bullets

Exemptions will remain for:

  • Military and police use
  • Elite athletes – proof will be required
  • Indoor Ranges
  • Outdoor ranges – provided control measures are present.
  • Small-calibre ammunition
  • Air weapon pellets
  • Collectors (Not for firing)
  • Academic and forensic work

Further detail:

Small Calibre – All calibres above 6.17mm (includes .243 and everything larger) intended for live quarry shooting will be restricted.

Packaging – All lead ammunition above 6.17 (.243) sold for target shooting will be labelled “must not be used for live quarry”.

Indoor use of lead shot – This will be formally restricted to ensure that the ban on lead shot generally can be effective at point of sale. This removes the possibility that any lead shot labelled for “indoor use only” would be used outdoors and closes this potential loophole.

Outdoor Target Ranges – Must be “permanent” – The detail of how this will be defined is unclear.

In conclusion:

Lead use can be traced back over 6,000 years in the widest variety of applications. It’s density, malleability and cost-effective nature are significant contributors to the longevity of its use.

Given the breadth of evidence, few would contest the rationale behind a transition away from but it seems as if the changes impacting on UK Shooting are happening almost monthly.

Having said this there is one section of the announcement that we would highlight:

“Alternatives to lead shot have become more efficient and widely available in recent years, with steel and tungsten-based shot being two popular options.

 

The government will continue to engage with the shooting industry to support the transition to alternative ammunition types.”

While non-lead alternatives are improving, uptake and availability remain varied.

We’d encourage the Home Office to remember that UK Shooting offers real benefits to both participants and the wider population. Moving forward meaningful consultation and engagement will be critical to ensure that this to ensure this shift does not feel disproportionate for UK shooting communities.

We’ll continue to monitor and update what this means for shooters, clubs, and retailers.

The Police Have Seized My Gun

The Police Have Seized My Gun 2560 1707 Vicky Downs

Whether prompted by an incident, a knock on the door, or a call from the police, having your lawfully held firearms seized can feel sudden and unsettling.

This guide explains the legal powers that allow police to seize firearms—and what you can do to protect your rights, challenge delays, or seek their return.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Withdraw with Wisdom

Withdraw with Wisdom 2560 2248 Vicky Downs

Anyone can withdraw a firearm or shotgun certificate application at any stage. While this avoids the formal consequences of refusal, it also removes the right of appeal and can be misused.

This article outlines key considerations and urges caution when withdrawal is suggested by police.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Borrowing Firearms

Borrowing Firearms 2560 1707 Vicky Downs

This guide outlines how UK law permits borrowing firearms in specific, lawful settings, helping certificate holders and newcomers understand their responsibilities and stay compliant. It covers exemptions for miniature rifle ranges, police-approved clay grounds, Home Office–approved clubs, and private lending arrangements. Each scenario is unpacked with relevant conditions, legal references, and practical guidance.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Scrap the System?

Scrap the System? 1920 2560 Vicky Downs

This visionary article explores how the UK’s firearms licensing system might look if designed from scratch.

Moving beyond a century of reactive laws—from the 1920 Firearms Act to post-Keyham reforms—it proposes a digitally enabled, service-focused framework built around public safety, consistency, and clarity.

Introduction –

Ask any certificate holder—licensing delays, legal ambiguity, and patchy communication aren’t just an inconvenience. They’re a public safety risk

If the UK were to design its firearms licensing system from scratch tomorrow, what would it look like? With a century of legacy legislation behind us—from the 1920 Firearms Act to the post-Keyham reforms—the current framework is a patchwork of historical responses.

But what if we could start fresh?

To be clear. This article isn’t fantasy. It’s achievable and a call to action

🎯 Principles for a Modern Licensing System

1. Serve the Public

Good service to certificate holders matters—but responsible licensing affects everyone. We’ve seen how poor decisions can damage community trust and compromise safety. A modern system must put fairness, transparency, and public confidence first.

2. Focus on Public Safety

Licensing isn’t just administration—it’s risk management. Lessons from past tragedies remind us: public protection must be the system’s central goal. Everything else flows from that.

3. Digital by Default, Inclusive by Design

A streamlined digital portal should be the norm—but never at the cost of access. Paper options remain where needed. Efficiency and equity can coexist.

4. Efficient Processing & Smart Safeguards

Applications and renewals should be timely, error-resistant, and secure. No medical proformas. No paper-based loopholes. Fraud risk reduced through smart design.

5. Central Oversight, Local Delivery

Leadership at the national level ensures consistency with local units continuing to engage. This balance helps eliminate patchy training, conflicting processes, and appeals driven by regional disparity.

6. Clarity & Accessibility of the Law

Rewrite the legal framework in plain English. Define terms clearly. Replace decades of piecemeal amendments with a single, understandable system—so applicants know their responsibilities and authorities apply the law fairly.

7. Transparent Cost Recovery

Fees should be proportionate, visible, and linked to service standards. Applicants deserve to know what they’re paying for—and how delivery is being measured.

🧠 What Would Be Lost—and Gained?

We’d lose the historical inertia of legacy legislation, but gain a system built for today’s risks and realities. Certificate holders would benefit from clarity and fairness; police forces from consistency and resourcing; and the public from a licensing regime that’s proactive, not reactive.

There will be challenges – Eliminating the current Court Appeal process will not be an overnight endeavour but the current system involves thousands of pounds worth of police, Court and legal effort when an estimated 90% don’t require anything more than independent arbitration.

Some might say this is wishful thinking—but firearmslicensing.net has already proved digital safeguards are possible (See our digital membership card). So why wait?

If you support a smarter licensing future, start the conversation—share your ideas, challenge assumptions, and help push for change.

Accurate Applications

Accurate Applications 2560 2432 Vicky Downs

This practical guide from Guest Author Conor Monighan highlights how to avoid refusal or other issues when completing the application form.

Accuracy, honesty, and asking for help are essential—mistakes aren’t always easily forgiven.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Certificate Refused or Revoked

Certificate Refused or Revoked 2560 1707 Vicky Downs

Guest Author, Barrister Conor Monighan outlines what to do if your firearms, shotgun, or explosives certificate has been refused or revoked.

While police decisions are serious, they can be challenged but professional support is essential.

Use the “Contact Us” function of this website to secure help.

Sorry you do not have access to this content - register or upgrade.

Back to top